Proximal upper limb fractures in children

by Anria Horn


Learning Objectives

  1. Identify and describe common upper limb fractures in children.
  2. Understand how to manage these fractures conservatively.

Clinical assessment

Children tend to sustain fractures in predictable locations. The most common mechanism of injury for all upper limb fractures is a fall on an outstretched hand (FOOSH). The most common fractures are clavicular > distal radius (+/- ulna) > supracondylar fractures. The growth plate is a weak spot in children’s bones, and fractures often occur through and around them. It is important to know what normal growth plates and ossification centres look like to identify these fractures.

Clavicular fractures

Clavicular fractures are the most common in children and are a common birth injury. One should exclude neurovascular injury as there is close proximity to the brachial plexus and large vessels.

Management

Conservative management, involving a collar and cuff or arm sling, is indicated for all clavicular fractures in children. However, conservative management should not be applied to open clavicular fractures or those associated with vascular injury (rare).

Humeral fractures

Spiral humerus fractures in small children are suspicious for non-accidental injury. In all of these fractures, one should exclude axillary nerve (proximal humerus) or radial nerve (midshaft) injury.

Management

Fractures around the elbow

There are many ossification centres around the elbow appearing at different timesas the child matures. These ossification centres may look like fractures to the inexperienced eye. The acronym CRITOE/ CRMTOL is useful to remember the ossification centres and when they appear. The appearance of the ossification centres is summarised in the table and images below.

C Capitellum 1–2 years
R Radial head 3–4 years
I/M Internal/medial epicondyle 5–6 years
T Trochlea 7–8 years
O Olecranon 9–10 years
E/L External/lateral epicondyle 11–12 years
Ossification centres
Ossification centres

Management principle: It is important to note that you should never use a circular cast for elbow fractures, always a backslab.

Supracondylar fractures

There is a weak spot above the humeral condyles at the level of the olecranon and coronoid fossae. Injuries here are typically FOOSH.

Clinical examination and investigations

I. Undisplaced fracture

Here one may only see the fat pad sign. The fat pad sign is appreciated on the lateral view X-ray. Usually, an anterior fat pad can be seen. The presence of a posterior fat pad on X-ray is abnormal.

Grade 1 supracondylar fracture evidenced by the presence of a posterior fat pad. It is undisplaced as the anterior humeral line passes through the capitellum.
Grade 1 supracondylar fracture evidenced by the presence of a posterior fat pad. It is undisplaced as the anterior humeral line passes through the capitellum.

II. Partially displaced with intact posterior periosteal hinge

If the anterior humeral line crosses the capitellum, no reduction is required, and management is as for Type 1.

III. Completely displaced fracture

Here there is a completely displaced fracture (See below: the anterior humeral line does not pass through the capitellum). There is a high risk of neurovascular injury (an orthopaedic emergency). These patients require urgent reduction and referral for operative management.

Grade II supracondylar fracture.
Grade II supracondylar fracture.

Complications may include: